Landmark Decision on Spousal Support
In a significant ruling addressing inflation and changing economic realities, the Delhi High Court has raised the monthly maintenance allowance of a 60-year-old woman. The court overturned a family court’s earlier decision that had rejected her plea for revision. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized that spousal maintenance must reflect both rising living costs and the enhanced financial capacity of the paying partner, even after retirement.
Background of the Case
The woman married in April 1990, but the relationship ended in divorce just two years later due to physical and mental abuse and dowry demands by her husband. In 1993, the family court ordered the husband, then a government employee, to pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance.
Plea for Increased Support
In 2018, the woman sought a revision of the maintenance amount. She argued that her husband’s promotion from Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) to Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) had significantly raised his salary. Despite retiring in 2017, he continued to earn on an extended contract. She highlighted that his net income at the time of the original order was Rs 28,705, but now he draws a pension and additional income of around Rs 40,000. She also pointed out being removed from his Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) card, which denied her essential medical coverage.
Family Court’s Denial and Appeal
In September 2024, the family court dismissed her request, citing her bank statement as evidence of no financial distress. Dissatisfied, she appealed to the High Court, stressing inflation, her deteriorated financial situation, and her husband’s improved capacity to pay.
High Court’s Intervention
The High Court sided with the woman, criticizing the family court for ignoring crucial factors. Justice Sharma observed:
“The increment in his earnings, along with the substantial hike in the cost of living, constitutes a changed situation warranting revision of maintenance.”
The court ordered the monthly allowance to be raised from Rs 10,000 to Rs 14,000, effective from the date of her revision petition. It also directed the husband to reinstate her name on the CGHS card within two months, restoring her access to healthcare facilities.
Wider Implications
This verdict has been hailed as a progressive step towards ensuring justice and dignity for divorced women facing financial hardship. Legal experts believe the ruling will encourage more individuals to seek maintenance revisions when the paying partner’s financial standing improves.
A Progressive Trend in Indian Law
The judgment reflects a broader trend in Indian courts, where inflation, healthcare costs, and retirement earnings are increasingly factored into maintenance cases. For the woman at the centre of this case, the ruling not only provides financial relief but also restores her right to live securely and with dignity.