Governor Demands New Rules
The Governor of Odisha has called for stricter regulations to bring state-run firms and autonomous organisations under the scrutiny of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). This move aims to ensure transparency in the use of public funds and close gaps in accountability.
Background: Loopholes in Oversight
The push for change follows a high-level meeting last month where the Accountant General identified weaknesses in the current system. Many state-funded bodies, including autonomous institutions, currently operate without mandatory CAG audits, allowing significant financial activity to remain unchecked.
Key Organisations in Focus
Large entities such as the Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT) and the Industrial Development Corporation of Odisha (IDCO) are at the center of this initiative.
-
IDCO received approximately ₹1,957.77 crore in 2021-22 and ₹1,935.59 crore in 2022-23.
-
OUAT received ₹758.28 crore in 2022-23 and ₹707.52 crore in 2023-24.
Despite handling such large funds, these organisations remain largely outside the formal audit net, relying instead on internal or alternative checks that critics argue are insufficient.
Wider Concerns Across the State
It’s not just IDCO and OUAT—many schools and autonomous bodies in Odisha similarly operate without CAG oversight. Officials worry that the lack of external auditing could lead to financial mismanagement or misuse of funds. One senior official remarked, “With so much money in play, how can we ensure it’s being used properly?”
Potential Reforms and Public Trust
The Governor’s intervention is seen as a step toward strengthening transparency and accountability. Questions now remain: Why were these organisations previously excluded from the audit net? Will the state government act promptly on the Governor’s advice, or will bureaucratic delays slow the reforms?
Eyes on the Chief Secretary
All attention is now on the Chief Secretary’s desk. Implementing tighter CAG oversight could mark a crucial step in closing gaps, preventing mismanagement, and boosting public confidence. Until then, concerns persist over who is truly monitoring the flow of substantial state funds.