In a significant development amid the ongoing Aravalli hills controversy, the Supreme Court has clarified that its earlier directions issued on November 20 regarding the Aravalli range will not be implemented until the next hearing of the case. The apex court has scheduled the next hearing for January 21, and ordered that the status quo be maintained until then.
The court made it clear that no action should be taken based on the November 20 order until a comprehensive examination of all related issues is completed.
Court Seeks Detailed and Independent Review
During the hearing, the Supreme Court expressed serious concern over ambiguities surrounding the definition and extent of the Aravalli hill range. The bench observed that before enforcing its previous directions, an independent, neutral, and comprehensive review is essential to ensure clarity and fairness.
The court underlined that the complexities involved in the matter require careful consideration of multiple environmental, geographical, and legal aspects.
Concerns Over Definition of Aravalli Hills
The Supreme Court noted that there is significant confusion regarding the exact definition of the Aravalli hills and mountain range, which must be resolved before any enforcement action. The bench emphasized that a clear and scientifically sound definition is crucial to determine the scope of protection and regulatory measures.
The court also flagged uncertainty regarding areas located beyond 500 metres from the Aravalli range, raising questions about whether such regions fall under environmental restrictions or outside the purview of the earlier order.
Mining Ban and Its Scope Under Scrutiny
Another key issue highlighted by the court was the lack of clarity surrounding the ban or permission of mining activities in the Aravalli region. The Supreme Court observed that there is confusion over whether mining is entirely prohibited, conditionally allowed, or permitted in specific zones, and what the geographical limits of such restrictions should be.
The bench stated that these ambiguities could have serious legal and economic implications if left unaddressed.
CJI Stresses Need for Comprehensive Report
During the proceedings, the Chief Justice of India remarked that enforcing the November 20 directions without a thorough and independent report would be premature. He stressed the need for a detailed assessment that examines environmental impact, legal definitions, and ground realities before arriving at a final decision.
The court reiterated that all critical aspects must be evaluated in depth to avoid unintended consequences.
Status Quo to Continue Till January 21
Until the next hearing on January 21, the Supreme Court directed that the existing situation be maintained, ensuring that no irreversible steps are taken. The court’s decision aims to provide adequate time for careful deliberation on one of the country’s most sensitive environmental and regulatory issues.
The Aravalli range, one of the oldest mountain systems in the world, plays a vital role in maintaining ecological balance in northern and western India, making the case a matter of national importance.