Humility Lesson: Anil Kumble Slams Shukri Conrad Over Arrogant Post-Match Jab

OdishaConnect — Thu, 27 Nov 2025 07:52:39 +0000

South Africa Coach’s Remark Reignites Painful Cricket History

South Africa coach Shukri Conrad has sparked widespread criticism after using the charged term “grovel” to describe his team’s strategy against India in the second Test. The comment, made on the fourth day following South Africa’s declaration at 260 for 5, has evoked memories of cricket’s controversial past and triggered a debate on humility and sportsmanship.

Conrad’s Words Draw Historical Comparisons

Conrad explained that the tactic was meant to “tire out” India and see them “grovelling on their knees.” The term immediately drew comparisons to the infamous 1976 England-West Indies series, where then-captain Tony Greig, a white South African, urged his team to make their West Indian rivals “grovel,” leading to a 3-0 series whitewash amid the apartheid-era tension.

Cricket Legends Express Disapproval

Former India coach Anil Kumble criticized Conrad on Star Sports, highlighting the historical baggage the word carries. He said:
“Fifty years ago, Greig said something similar, and we know what followed. South Africa may be leading, but humility is better than arrogance at the top level.”

South African fast-bowling legend Dale Steyn also expressed disappointment, stating:
“Even if this is milder than Greig’s case, such words shouldn’t be used. I’m sorry, Shukri, but it’s not okay.”

On-Field Battle Continues Amid Off-Field Drama

Meanwhile, India is attempting an unlikely win on a spinner-friendly pitch, while South Africa’s on-field dominance is overshadowed by the off-field language controversy. Conrad has so far refused to apologize, and the cricketing fraternity continues to debate the implications of his words.

Cricket Community Watches Closely

The incident highlights cricket’s ongoing struggle with its colonial and apartheid-era baggage. Fans and former players alike are closely monitoring the fallout, with many questioning whether Conrad’s words reflect a lapse in judgment or a deeper disregard for cricketing decorum.