<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gender equality India Archives - Odisha Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="https://odishaconnect.com/tag/gender-equality-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://odishaconnect.com/tag/gender-equality-india/</link>
	<description>We Deep Dive Into The News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.12</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran Sparks Controversy Over North-South Comparison on Women’s Empowerment</title>
		<link>https://odishaconnect.com/dayanidhi-maran-tamil-nadu-women-empowerment-controversy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OdishaConnect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BJP criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayanidhi Maran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMK defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMK MP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MK Stalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North South divide India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern India women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Periyar ideals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political controversy India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu DMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu women empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulagam Ungal Kaiyil scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women education Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odishaconnect.com/?p=7523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="669" height="403" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1.jpg 669w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1-300x181.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 669px) 100vw, 669px" /></div>
<p>DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran has sparked a political row after comparing women’s empowerment in Tamil Nadu with northern India. Speaking at a college event in Chennai, he praised Tamil Nadu’s focus on education and opportunities for girls, prompting criticism from the BJP and a strong defence from the DMK highlighting the Dravidian model of gender equality.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/dayanidhi-maran-tamil-nadu-women-empowerment-controversy/">DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran Sparks Controversy Over North-South Comparison on Women’s Empowerment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="669" height="403" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1.jpg 669w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/odisha-connect-1-1-300x181.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 669px) 100vw, 669px" /></div><div class="flex flex-col text-sm pb-25">
<article class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id="request-WEB:3d7097ea-5f7c-4456-b4bf-61616159db48-24" data-testid="conversation-turn-50" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn="assistant">
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:--spacing(4)] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(6)] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(16)] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" tabindex="-1">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="4db14e16-9b90-4623-8d63-605e787b65a1" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-mini">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[1px]">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full break-words light markdown-new-styling">
<p data-start="128" data-end="451">DMK MP <strong data-start="135" data-end="154">Dayanidhi Maran</strong> has sparked a political controversy after comparing the status of women in <strong data-start="230" data-end="244">Tamil Nadu</strong> to that in <strong data-start="256" data-end="274">northern India</strong>, drawing criticism from the <strong data-start="303" data-end="310">BJP</strong> and a strong defence from his own party. The remarks highlight ongoing debates over women’s empowerment and regional differences in India.</p>
<h4 data-start="458" data-end="501"><strong data-start="463" data-end="499">Remarks at Chennai College Event</strong></h4>
<p data-start="502" data-end="758">Maran made the comments while speaking at <strong data-start="544" data-end="602">Quaid-E-Millath Government College of Women in Chennai</strong> on Tuesday. The event was part of the <strong data-start="641" data-end="664">Ulagam Ungal Kaiyil</strong> scheme, where <strong data-start="679" data-end="743">Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin distributed laptops</strong> to students.</p>
<p data-start="760" data-end="1062">Praising Tamil Nadu’s focus on <strong data-start="791" data-end="831">educating girls and empowering women</strong>, Maran encouraged students to take the laptops with confidence and pride, crediting the <strong data-start="920" data-end="939">Dravidian model</strong> and the ideals of <strong data-start="958" data-end="969">Periyar</strong> and <strong data-start="974" data-end="1002">Chief Minister MK Stalin</strong>, whom he called “the best Chief Minister in the country.”</p>
<p data-start="1064" data-end="1261">He contrasted this with northern India, stating:<br data-start="1112" data-end="1115" /><em data-start="1115" data-end="1259">&#8220;What do they say in the North? Girls, do not go to work; be at home, be in the kitchen, birth children, that is what you are supposed to do.&#8221;</em></p>
<h4 data-start="1268" data-end="1292"><strong data-start="1273" data-end="1290">BJP Criticism</strong></h4>
<p data-start="1293" data-end="1349">The remarks were immediately condemned by the <strong data-start="1339" data-end="1346">BJP</strong>.</p>
<ul data-start="1351" data-end="1719">
<li data-start="1351" data-end="1484">
<p data-start="1353" data-end="1484"><strong data-start="1353" data-end="1378">Narayanan Thiruppathy</strong>, Tamil Nadu BJP spokesperson, accused Maran of <strong data-start="1426" data-end="1457">abusing North Indian people</strong> and demanded an apology.</p>
</li>
<li data-start="1485" data-end="1719">
<p data-start="1487" data-end="1719"><strong data-start="1487" data-end="1512">BJP chief Anila Singh</strong> described the comments as “unfortunate,” citing prominent women leaders such as <strong data-start="1593" data-end="1662">Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, and President Droupadi Murmu</strong>, and stressed that India cannot be divided regionally.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h4 data-start="1726" data-end="1750"><strong data-start="1731" data-end="1748">DMK’s Defence</strong></h4>
<p data-start="1751" data-end="2056">Senior DMK leader <strong data-start="1769" data-end="1786">TKS Elangovan</strong> defended Maran, highlighting the party’s role in promoting <strong data-start="1846" data-end="1911">women’s education, employment, and reservations in Tamil Nadu</strong>. He argued that the DMK has historically championed women’s empowerment, in contrast to northern states where similar initiatives have lagged.</p>
<p data-start="2058" data-end="2185">The party maintained that Maran’s comments were intended to <strong data-start="2118" data-end="2159">praise Tamil Nadu’s progressive model</strong>, not insult any region.</p>
<h4 data-start="2192" data-end="2231"><strong data-start="2197" data-end="2229">Wider Political Implications</strong></h4>
<p data-start="2232" data-end="2537">The controversy underscores the <strong data-start="2264" data-end="2286">North-South divide</strong> in Indian politics and debates over <strong data-start="2323" data-end="2346">women’s empowerment</strong>. Critics argue that Maran’s statements could fuel regional sensitivities, while supporters claim it highlights the <strong data-start="2462" data-end="2505">success of Tamil Nadu’s Dravidian model</strong> in promoting gender equality.</p>
<p data-start="2539" data-end="2721" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">As the debate continues, the remarks have reignited discussions about <strong data-start="2609" data-end="2633">regional disparities</strong> in social development and the political narratives surrounding women’s rights in India.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/dayanidhi-maran-tamil-nadu-women-empowerment-controversy/">DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran Sparks Controversy Over North-South Comparison on Women’s Empowerment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother’s Caste Determines Child’s Identity: Landmark Ruling by the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-mothers-caste-certificate-ruling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OdishaConnect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caste certificate guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caste certificate ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caste identity India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional rights caste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education reservation India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment quota India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government caste reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indira Jaising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inter-caste marriage rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice PB Varale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Vikram Nath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh caste dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal caste recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mother’s caste inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajasthan caste certificate case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reservation policy India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC ST reservation benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social justice India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odishaconnect.com/?p=6764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="540" height="303" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg 540w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court-300x168.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" /></div>
<p>In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has held that children can inherit their mother’s caste for certification and reservation benefits, calling previous denials discriminatory and unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-mothers-caste-certificate-ruling/">Mother’s Caste Determines Child’s Identity: Landmark Ruling by the Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="540" height="303" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg 540w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court-300x168.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" /></div><p data-start="212" data-end="464">In a landmark judgment challenging long-held patriarchal norms, the Supreme Court on Monday ruled that children are fully entitled to receive caste certificates based on their mother’s caste, even if the father belongs to a socially advanced community.</p>
<h2 data-start="471" data-end="536"><strong data-start="474" data-end="536">Historic Ruling Upholds Equality and Constitutional Rights</strong></h2>
<p data-start="538" data-end="873">A bench of <strong data-start="549" data-end="589">Justices Vikram Nath and P.B. Varale</strong> dismissed multiple appeals filed by the Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh governments, affirming that children of inter-caste couples—especially those where the mother is from a <strong data-start="763" data-end="787">Scheduled Caste (SC)</strong> or <strong data-start="791" data-end="815">Scheduled Tribe (ST)</strong>—are eligible for reservation benefits through the mother.</p>
<p data-start="875" data-end="1043">“The mother’s caste is as much an identity as the father’s. Denying certificates on the basis of the father is discriminatory and unconstitutional,” the bench observed.</p>
<h2 data-start="1050" data-end="1103"><strong data-start="1053" data-end="1103">Authorities Criticised for ‘Backward’ Refusals</strong></h2>
<p data-start="1105" data-end="1348">The case emerged after repeated denials from state authorities who rejected caste certificate applications because the father belonged to the general category—even in situations where children were raised within their mother’s SC/ST community.</p>
<p data-start="1350" data-end="1563">Calling such refusals <strong data-start="1372" data-end="1386">“backward”</strong>, the Court said the practice violated <strong data-start="1425" data-end="1447">Articles 14 and 15</strong> of the Constitution, as well as provisions under <strong data-start="1497" data-end="1521">Articles 338 and 342</strong>, designed to protect marginalised groups.</p>
<h2 data-start="1570" data-end="1625"><strong data-start="1573" data-end="1625">Major Boost for Children of Marginalised Mothers</strong></h2>
<p data-start="1627" data-end="1893">Legal experts and social justice advocates hailed the ruling as a transformative milestone.<br data-start="1718" data-end="1721" />“This eliminates the default assumption that caste is only inherited through the father,” said senior counsel <strong data-start="1831" data-end="1849">Indira Jaising</strong>, who served as amicus curiae in the matter.</p>
<p data-start="1895" data-end="2108">The judgement is expected to particularly benefit children of SC/ST mothers who marry outside their caste and often face bureaucratic barriers in accessing reservation benefits, scholarships, and community rights.</p>
<h2 data-start="2115" data-end="2184"><strong data-start="2118" data-end="2184">Centre Directs States to Update Guidelines Within Three Months</strong></h2>
<p data-start="2186" data-end="2397">The Union Government has directed all states to <strong data-start="2234" data-end="2265">revise administrative rules</strong> and reevaluate pending caste certificate applications within <strong data-start="2327" data-end="2343">three months</strong> to ensure compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling.</p>
<p data-start="2399" data-end="2673">For millions of children awaiting access to <strong data-start="2443" data-end="2521">educational opportunities, employment quotas, and community-based benefits</strong>, the decision serves as a long-awaited recognition that in modern India, <strong data-start="2595" data-end="2672">a mother’s lineage holds equal legal and social weight as a father’s name</strong>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-mothers-caste-certificate-ruling/">Mother’s Caste Determines Child’s Identity: Landmark Ruling by the Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Echoes of Equity: Supreme Court Raps Centre on Women&#8217;s 33% Quota Delay</title>
		<link>https://odishaconnect.com/echoes-of-equity-supreme-court-raps-centre-on-womens-33-quota-delay/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OdishaConnect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[106th Constitutional Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[33% reservation women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress leader Jaya Thakur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female political participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lok Sabha women MPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajya Sabha women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reservation for women in elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state assembly women representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women empowerment India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in politics India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women reservation India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odishaconnect.com/?p=6213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="540" height="303" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg 540w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court-300x168.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" /></div>
<p>The Supreme Court has asked the Centre and state governments to respond within four weeks on implementing 33% reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies. Despite the historic 106th Constitutional Amendment, delays in census and delimitation are holding back full participation of women in Indian democracy.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/echoes-of-equity-supreme-court-raps-centre-on-womens-33-quota-delay/">Echoes of Equity: Supreme Court Raps Centre on Women&#8217;s 33% Quota Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="540" height="303" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court.jpg 540w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/aupreme-court-300x168.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" /></div><p>The Supreme Court issued a landmark warning about the persistent gender inequality in India, requesting the Centre and state governments to provide answers on the implementation of a 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies within four weeks. The bench, consisting of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan, called women &#8220;the biggest minority&#8221;, almost 48% of the population, and asked the question of why such equity depends on reservation at all, while at the same time it was investigating the government&#8217;s timeline for the census and delimitation.</p>
<p>The focus is on the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, the historic 106th Constitutional Amendment of September 2023, which was celebrated as a breakthrough for the reservation of one-third of seats in Parliament, Delhi&#8217;s assembly, and all state legislatures. However, its implementation is waiting for a new census and the redrawing of boundaries, thus causing courts to be flooded with petitions like the one from Congress leader Jaya Thakur, who expresses her disbelief at the fact that, after 75 years of independence, women still have to approach the judiciary to claim their rights in a democracy.</p>
<p>The march towards equity is being held up by several corollary issues. According to the Ministry of Women and Child Development&#8217;s report of July, the number of women candidates has risen gradually from a paltry 3% in the 1957 election to 10% in 2024. Women MPs in the Lok Sabha increased from 22 in the first House to 75 in the 18th (14% of the total), whereas the number of female members in the Rajya Sabha rose from 15 in 1952 to 42 nowadays (17%). The report points out that this achievement is the result of a &#8220;whole-of-government, whole-of-society&#8221; effort which places women&#8217;s empowerment at the centre.</p>
<p>While answers are awaited, the question remains: Will the administrative steps cause delays in participation, or will they lead to a more courageous, far-reaching horizon? On this pivot of ballots and benches, what would be your next move?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/echoes-of-equity-supreme-court-raps-centre-on-womens-33-quota-delay/">Echoes of Equity: Supreme Court Raps Centre on Women&#8217;s 33% Quota Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
