<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>greenfield airport India Archives - Odisha Connect</title>
	<atom:link href="https://odishaconnect.com/tag/greenfield-airport-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://odishaconnect.com/tag/greenfield-airport-india/</link>
	<description>We Deep Dive Into The News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>CJI Gavai Recalls May 16 Verdict to Save ₹20,000 Crore Projects</title>
		<link>https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-retracts-vanashakti-order-environmental-clearance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OdishaConnect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIIMS Bhubaneswar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJI B.R. Gavai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development vs environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental law India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental safeguards India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenfield airport India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Supreme Court news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure demolition India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial recall India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post facto environmental clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public infrastructure India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Vanashakti case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://odishaconnect.com/?p=6421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="745" height="378" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI-.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI-.jpg 745w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI--300x152.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 745px) 100vw, 745px" /></div>
<p>The Supreme Court has retracted its controversial May 16 Vanashakti case ruling that mandated the demolition of constructions with post-facto environmental clearance. While the decision averts immediate demolition of critical projects, a dissenting opinion warns it could weaken environmental accountability and set a risky precedent</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-retracts-vanashakti-order-environmental-clearance/">CJI Gavai Recalls May 16 Verdict to Save ₹20,000 Crore Projects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="745" height="378" src="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI-.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI-.jpg 745w, https://odishaconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CJI--300x152.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 745px) 100vw, 745px" /></div><p data-start="147" data-end="561">n a significant development, the <strong data-start="181" data-end="207">Supreme Court of India</strong> on Tuesday <strong data-start="219" data-end="268">retracted its May 16 Vanashakti case decision</strong>, which had mandated the demolition of constructions that obtained environmental clearance post facto. The recall was issued by a <strong data-start="398" data-end="419">three-judge bench</strong> led by <strong data-start="427" data-end="464">Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai</strong> and comprising <strong data-start="480" data-end="527">Justices K. Vinod Chandran and Ujjal Bhuyan</strong>, in a <strong data-start="534" data-end="558">2:1 majority verdict</strong>.</p>
<h2 data-start="568" data-end="611">Background: May 16 Vanashakti Decision</h2>
<p data-start="613" data-end="1025">The original <strong data-start="626" data-end="645">two-judge bench</strong>, including <strong data-start="657" data-end="699">Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan</strong>, had ruled that <strong data-start="716" data-end="767">post facto environmental approvals were illegal</strong>, ordering the demolition of such projects. This decision sparked concerns about the potential <strong data-start="862" data-end="910">demolition of critical public infrastructure</strong> valued at nearly ₹20,000 crore, including <strong data-start="953" data-end="993">AIIMS Bhubaneswar’s 962-bed hospital</strong> and a <strong data-start="1000" data-end="1022">greenfield airport</strong>.</p>
<h2 data-start="1032" data-end="1078">Centre Highlights Potential National Loss</h2>
<p data-start="1080" data-end="1439">During the hearing, the <strong data-start="1104" data-end="1163">Central government submitted a list of stalled projects</strong> and warned that enforcing the May order could have <strong data-start="1215" data-end="1242">disastrous consequences</strong> for essential facilities. The <strong data-start="1273" data-end="1293">majority opinion</strong>, penned by CJI Gavai, stated that the earlier order risked a <strong data-start="1355" data-end="1374">“national loss”</strong> and endangered the existence of crucial public infrastructure.</p>
<h2 data-start="1446" data-end="1496">Dissenting Opinion: Justice Bhuyan’s Concerns</h2>
<p data-start="1498" data-end="1829">Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, in his <strong data-start="1527" data-end="1546">97-page dissent</strong>, described the recall as a <strong data-start="1574" data-end="1595">“retrograde step”</strong> that undermines the <strong data-start="1616" data-end="1643">precautionary principle</strong> in environmental law. He cautioned that allowing <strong data-start="1693" data-end="1718">post facto clearances</strong> diminishes accountability and could set a <strong data-start="1761" data-end="1790">hazardous legal precedent</strong> for future environmental governance.</p>
<h2 data-start="1836" data-end="1891">Balancing Development and Environmental Safeguards</h2>
<p data-start="1893" data-end="2199">The judgement has reignited discussions on how India can <strong data-start="1950" data-end="2003">balance development with environmental protection</strong>. While the recall <strong data-start="2022" data-end="2055">prevents immediate demolition</strong>, it leaves unresolved questions about <strong data-start="2094" data-end="2164">judicial consistency, accountability, and environmental governance</strong> in similar cases moving forward.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://odishaconnect.com/supreme-court-retracts-vanashakti-order-environmental-clearance/">CJI Gavai Recalls May 16 Verdict to Save ₹20,000 Crore Projects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://odishaconnect.com">Odisha Connect</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
