Justice Suryakant Archives - Odisha Connect

Supreme Court Paves Way for Aspiring Doctor: EWS Student’s Bold Self-Defence Wins MBBS Seat

OdishaConnect — Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:03:43 +0000

Atharva cleared the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) twice, scoring an impressive 530 marks. However, despite qualifying on merit, he was repeatedly denied admission to private medical colleges under the EWS quota.

The reason was not academic performance but administrative delay. The Madhya Pradesh government had failed to issue the necessary reservation notification on time, effectively blocking eligible students from claiming EWS benefits.

For Atharva, months of uncertainty followed — but he refused to give up.

Fighting Alone in Court

In an extraordinary move, Atharva chose to represent himself in court proceedings without engaging a lawyer. After approaching the High Court without success, he moved the Supreme Court.

During an online hearing in February, he directly addressed Justice Suryakant, requesting just 10 minutes to present his case. His clarity and conviction reportedly impressed the bench.

The judges observed that meritorious students should not suffer due to policy lapses or bureaucratic delays.

Article 142 Powers Come into Play

Initially, the court indicated that the plea may not be maintainable for direct admission claims. However, invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution — which allows the court to ensure “complete justice” — the bench intervened.

Led by Justice Suryakant, the court ruled that administrative inefficiency cannot deprive qualified candidates of their rights.

The bench directed the Madhya Pradesh government and the National Medical Commission to grant Atharva provisional admission for the 2025–26 academic session and allocate him a medical college within seven days.

A Ray of Hope for Students

The ruling is being seen as a significant precedent for students facing similar bureaucratic hurdles across the country. Legal experts believe the judgment reinforces the principle that governance failures should not penalize deserving aspirants.

For Atharva, the verdict marks the beginning of a long-awaited medical journey. For thousands of students navigating complex admission systems, it stands as a reminder that perseverance — combined with constitutional safeguards — can overcome even the most daunting institutional obstacles.

His story is now being hailed as an inspiring example of determination, courage, and faith in the judicial system.

The post Supreme Court Paves Way for Aspiring Doctor: EWS Student’s Bold Self-Defence Wins MBBS Seat appeared first on Odisha Connect.

Supreme Court Scrutinises Bihar’s Voter List Revision Amid Allegations of Mass Exclusions

OdishaConnect — Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:42:46 +0000

Hearing Centers on Special Intensive Revision Process
On March 21, 2023, a crucial Supreme Court hearing before Justices Suryakant and Dipankar Datta examined petitions challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls. The proceedings questioned the legality, accuracy, and procedural fairness of the revision process, which has sparked concerns over voter disenfranchisement.

ECI Admits Scope for Errors in Large-Scale Exercise
During the hearing, the Election Commission of India (ECI) acknowledged that errors were inevitable in a project of such scale. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the ECI, admitted that mistakes such as wrongly marking living individuals as deceased were “unfortunate but inevitable.” The bench, however, pressed for specific figures and questioned the adequacy of verification measures carried out by Booth Level Officers.

Petitioners Alleging Massive Exclusions
Senior advocate Gopal Shankaranarayan alleged that the SIR had excluded as many as 65 lakh voters, while senior advocate Kapil Sibal highlighted a constituency where 12 living voters were listed as deceased. Sibal argued that the BLOs failed to properly verify records, and that the SIR ignored established procedures such as sending Form 4 notices or collecting supporting documents from residents.

Debate Over Legal Compliance and Procedural Norms
Sibal contended that the SIR could not be treated as a mere procedural update but amounted to an entirely new roll creation, requiring strict adherence to legal provisions. He questioned the implementation of Rule 12’s Form 5 and Form 6, stressing that citizens should not be required to provide Aadhaar for voter registration, and that date of birth and place of residence should suffice.

Burden of Proof at the Center of the Dispute
One of the key debates was over the burden of proof in voter eligibility challenges. Sibal cited Rule 13, stating that it is the objector—not the citizen—who must prove ineligibility. Justice Datta reinforced that if a citizen’s name is missing from the draft roll, the onus lies on the authorities to prove non-citizenship once a Form 6 application is submitted.

Pending Verdict with National Implications
Both the petitioners and the ECI acknowledged flaws in the SIR process. However, the Supreme Court refrained from delivering a final verdict on its compliance with electoral laws, instead adjourning the matter for further consideration. The outcome could set a precedent for voter-list corrections across India, with millions of Bihar’s electorate awaiting clarity on their voting status.

The post Supreme Court Scrutinises Bihar’s Voter List Revision Amid Allegations of Mass Exclusions appeared first on Odisha Connect.