Punjab and Haryana HC Quashes FIR, Rules Mere Talk Attempt Not Outraging Modesty

Court Rules Lack of Criminal Intent

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has annulled the FIR against a man accused of outraging a woman’s modesty under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justice Keerti Singh clarified that attempting to start a conversation with a woman against her will, though inappropriate, does not constitute a criminal act. The verdict emphasized that criminal intent and use of force are essential elements for a Section 354 violation, which were absent in this case.

Incident in Rohtak Library

The case arose from a complaint by a female doctor at a library in Rohtak. The accused reportedly sat beside her, said “Hi,” and tried to converse. After she repeatedly declined, saying she did not wish to talk, he left. The prosecution acknowledged that no criminal force was used, and the complainant was unharmed.

Legal Threshold Not Met

The court noted that while the accused’s actions were improper, they did not meet the legal threshold under Section 354, which requires intent to outrage a woman’s modesty through criminal force. Quoting the Naresh Aneja vs State of Uttar Pradesh judgement, the court reiterated that Section 354 applies only when force is used with intent to harm dignity, which was not evident here.

FIR and Proceedings Quashed

Justice Singh concluded that proceeding with the trial would be a misuse of the court’s power. Consequently, the FIR filed at PGIMS Police Station, Rohtak, under Sections 354 and 451, along with all subsequent proceedings, was quashed.

Implications and Debate

The ruling underscores the importance of clear evidence of intent in such cases. It has sparked discussions on how to balance fair legal process with sensitivity, ensuring that laws protect women’s dignity without overextending criminal liability.