Trump Claims He Averted India-Pakistan Nuclear War, Pushes for New Global Arms Deal

Former US President Donald Trump has asserted that he personally prevented potential nuclear conflicts between several countries, including nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan, during his tenure. Posting on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump also claimed to have averted clashes between Iran and Israel and Russia and Ukraine, though he did not provide specific evidence to support these statements.

Criticism of New START Treaty

Trump criticised the existing New START nuclear arms control treaty between the US and Russia, calling it a “poorly done” agreement that is being “openly violated.” He called for a new, modern treaty crafted by nuclear experts that could provide long-term stability.

“Instead of extending ‘New START’… we should have our nuclear experts work on a new, better, and modern treaty that can last for a long time,” Trump wrote, suggesting that the current framework is insufficient to meet today’s security challenges.

Emphasis on US Military Strength

The former president highlighted efforts during his first term (2017–2021) to rebuild and modernize the US armed forces. He mentioned enhancements to the nuclear arsenal, the establishment of the Space Force, and plans to add warships he described as “100 times more powerful” than those used in World War II, referencing vessels like the Iowa and Missouri.

Trump underscored that “the United States is the most powerful country in the world,” positioning the military expansions as a continuation of America’s global dominance.

Global Reactions and Context

Trump’s claims echo previous unverified statements he has made regarding his role in international security. While India and Pakistan have experienced border tensions historically, there have been no recent nuclear escalations reported.

His remarks come amid ongoing global concerns over arms control and nuclear proliferation, drawing mixed reactions from international observers. Experts note that while the former president’s statements highlight US military strength, they offer little concrete evidence of direct intervention in preventing conflicts.