Trump Calls Court Ruling ‘Biased’ as Tariff Powers Face Supreme Test

Donald Trump, the former President of the United States, has faced a major legal setback after a federal appeals court ruled that most of the tariffs imposed during his administration were unlawful. The decision has triggered widespread global debate, particularly in nations impacted by Trump’s aggressive trade policies.

Court Cites Abuse of Emergency Powers

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a New York Federal Trade Court ruling, stating that Trump had exceeded his authority by abusing emergency powers to enforce tariffs without sufficient legal justification. Judges emphasized that the President does not hold absolute power over tariffs and must act within the framework of established law.

Supreme Court Appeal on the Horizon

Although the verdict went against Trump, the court has allowed his legal team time to appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court. The deadline for filing this challenge has been set for October, leaving only a short window for Trump’s team to contest the ruling.

Trump’s Reaction and White House Defense

Reacting sharply to the decision, Trump denounced the ruling as “biased” and warned that implementing it could “destroy America’s economic foundation.” Meanwhile, White House spokesperson Kush Desai defended the administration’s position, asserting that Trump’s trade moves were legally justified and a sign of strength.

Global Backlash Against Tariffs

The ruling has reignited criticism of Trump’s trade war, which had caused disruptions across global markets. Nations in Asia, Europe, and Latin America, most affected by the tariffs, had already condemned the policies, citing economic hardship and retaliatory trade measures.

Implications for Executive Power and Trump’s Legacy

Legal experts argue that the verdict could become a landmark moment in defining the limits of executive power over trade policy. While the Supreme Court’s final judgment remains decisive, the ruling has already cast a shadow over Trump’s legacy and may restrict the authority of future presidents in shaping U.S. economic policy.