Costly Loyalty? BJD Suspends Two MLAs for Dissent Ahead of Rajya Sabha Polls

In a significant development indicating internal strife within the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), party leader and former Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik has suspended two MLAs—Arabinda Mahapatra of Patkura and Sanatan Mahakud of Champua—on charges of anti-party activities. The move comes ahead of crucial Rajya Sabha elections, raising questions about the party’s internal dynamics and handling of dissent.

Provocative Statements Spark Controversy

Patkura MLA Arabinda Mahapatra has publicly criticized the government for inaction against alleged corruption in the previous regime. In viral statements, he said, “Naveen is my leader. Pandian is not a leader. I talk directly to Naveen about whatever I need to discuss with him.” He also attacked party governance, stating, “When the ruling party simply chatters nonsense, what will become of it? … It is five years later, and nobody believes that you are going to do anything.”

These remarks were seen as openly challenging the authority of not just Naveen Patnaik but also his close aide V.K. Pandian, sparking disciplinary action.

Signal to Other Dissenters

Political analysts interpret the suspensions as a strong signal from the BJD leadership to maintain loyalty to both Naveen Patnaik and the Pandian-Babu duo. Observers suggest it may serve as a warning to other vocal critics, such as Kendujhar MLA Badri Narayan Patra and MP Debashish Samantaray, who have continued to challenge the party leadership without facing penalties so far.

Legacy of Bijay Mahapatra Fuels Speculation

Arabinda Mahapatra’s actions are reportedly influenced by his father, veteran leader Bijay Mahapatra, who was suspended by Naveen Patnaik in 2000. Bijay Mahapatra has been actively meeting local leaders, fueling speculation about potential new political alliances and shifts within the party.

BJD Faces Delicate Political Balance

With these suspensions and a previous vacancy, the BJD’s Assembly strength now stands at 48. The party faces a delicate situation: whether the aggressive disciplinary stance will reinforce authority or deepen internal fractures ahead of major elections remains uncertain. Political observers suggest that the coming months will reveal whether loyalty to Naveen Patnaik comes at a very high price or whether new unity within the party can be forged.