BCCI Contracts 2025-26: Axar Patel Demoted Despite Stellar Record – What Went Wrong?
Axar Patel’s contract downgrade sparks debate over BCCI selection logic
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has found itself at the centre of controversy after moving star all-rounder Axar Patel from Grade B to Grade C in its central contracts for the 2025–26 season. The decision has surprised fans and experts alike, especially given Patel’s long-standing contribution to Indian cricket across formats.
Axar Patel’s Consistent Contributions
Axar Patel has been a key figure in India’s setup for over 12 years, establishing himself as one of the country’s most dependable spin-bowling all-rounders. He is currently the vice-captain of India’s T20I team and has delivered match-winning performances, particularly in home Test conditions.
Across formats, Patel has played 15 Tests, 71 ODIs, and 88 T20Is, scoring over 2,200 runs and claiming more than 200 wickets. His all-round impact has often turned games in India’s favour, making the downgrade difficult for many to digest.
Possible Reasons Behind the Downgrade
According to sources, the BCCI’s decision may be linked to Patel’s limited appearances during the 2024–25 season. He did not feature in any Test matches and had only sporadic outings in white-ball cricket. Contract gradings are reportedly influenced by recent selection patterns rather than long-term contributions.
In contrast, players like Ravindra Jadeja and Shubman Gill have retained their Grade A status, reflecting their consistent involvement in the national side across formats.
Social Media Backlash and Expert Reactions
The downgrade has triggered a strong reaction on social media, with fans calling it “unfair” and “disrespectful” to a player who has delivered consistently when given opportunities.
Former India cricketer and commentator Aakash Chopra questioned the logic behind the decision, tweeting, “What else does Axar Patel need to do to get what he deserves?” Chopra highlighted Patel’s multi-format value and seniority, while also pointing out anomalies such as Hardik Pandya, KL Rahul, and Kuldeep Yadav missing out on Grade A, and young pacer Arshdeep Singh being placed in Grade C.
Concerns Over Impact vs Metrics
Several cricket analysts have argued that the current contract system focuses heavily on recent appearances and selection frequency, often overlooking a player’s overall impact and versatility. Such decisions, they warn, could affect team morale, especially for players who perform crucial roles without always being in the spotlight.
BCCI Maintains Silence
The BCCI has so far refrained from commenting on the controversy. However, the episode once again highlights the ongoing challenge Indian cricket faces—balancing performance metrics, selection policies, and loyalty to proven match-winners.
As discussions continue, Axar Patel’s downgrade remains a talking point, raising broader questions about how player value is measured in modern Indian cricket.

Comments are closed.